← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Distinct Gene Expression Profiles... 2016 · 100 cites
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
96.2
measured
pct q30 bases
92.7
measured
gc content pct
46.2
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0.19
measured
duplication rate pct
18.24
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.19
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
18.24
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
35 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0