← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Clarifying the Translational Pausing Landscape in Bacteria by Ri... 2016 · 185 cites
- riboCIRC: a comprehensive database of translatable circRNAs 2021 · 82 cites
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
5 / 5 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
7796364650
reported
total reads
155927293
reported
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
99.2
measured
pct q30 bases
98.6
measured
gc content pct
52.2
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
38.9
measured
adapter content pct
43.05
measured
duplication rate pct
50.93
measured
supplementary file types
WIG
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 76/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
98.6
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
38.9
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
43.05
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
50.93
measured
×0.4
54%
QC cost
22 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0