← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 11 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Aerobic glycolysis tunes YAP/TAZ transcriptional activity 2015 · 420 cites
- Changes of N6-methyladenosine modulators promote breast cancer p... 2019 · 168 cites
- Downregulation of long noncoding RNA MALAT1 induces epithelial-t... 2015 · 151 cites
8 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently