Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- On the Relationship of Protein and mRNA Dynamics in Vertebrate E... 2015 · 239 cites
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Xenopus laevis bulk RNA-seq with 101 bp reads provides good depth for isoform-level expression measurement, though quality is moderate (82.3% Q30, 87.8% Q20). Elevated GC content (56.2%) may reflect genomic bias; the dataset is suitable for developmental transcriptomics and comparative vertebrate expression studies with standard quality-based filtering.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0