← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- The Colonic Crypt Protects Stem Cells from Microbiota-Derived Me... 2016 · 722 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 / 12 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
11703752600
reported
total reads
234075052
reported
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
96.6
measured
pct q30 bases
90.6
measured
gc content pct
41.4
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
35.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
4.96
measured
supplementary file types
WIG
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
90.6
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
12 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0