Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- DNA repair in species with extreme lifespan differences 2015 · 194 cites
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human bulk RNA-seq with 101 bp reads and good base quality (93.6% Q30, 95.9% Q20) is substantially compromised by high adapter content (49.41%), indicating serious library preparation or quality issues. Successful reuse requires rigorous adapter removal; if achievable, the underlying sequences could support isoform-level expression analysis, but verification of data integrity is critical.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0