Glioblastoma from a homogenous cohort of patients treated within clinical trial
Analysis of 80 glioblastoma specimen of patients treated within clinical trials and 4 samples of "normal" brain tissue (non-tumoral). The data was used to identify factors of resistance to a chemoradiation therapy protocol of radiotherapy and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (alkylating agent).
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 58 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- DNA-methylation-mediated activating of lncRNA SNHG12 promotes te... 2020 · 346 cites
- N6-Methyladenosine Modulates Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Hum... 2019 · 267 cites
- Identification of thioridazine, an antipsychotic drug, as an ant... 2015 · 148 cites
- Causal Mechanistic Regulatory Network for Glioblastoma Deciphere... 2016 · 146 cites
- RNA binding protein NKAP protects glioblastoma cells from ferrop... 2022 · 129 cites
- Blocking lncRNA MALAT1/miR-199a/ZHX1 Axis Inhibits Glioblastoma... 2019 · 117 cites
- The Long Noncoding RNA MALAT-1 is A Novel Biomarker in Various C... 2016 · 112 cites
- Chromosome 7 gain and DNA hypermethylation at the HOXA10 locus a... 2015 · 111 cites
- Glycosylated extracellular vesicles released by glioblastoma cel... 2018 · 102 cites
- Removing batch effects for prediction problems with frozen surro... 2014 · 88 cites
- Expression Profile Analysis Identifies a Novel Five-Gene Signatu... 2019 · 84 cites
47 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.