GSE79500

GEO first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Characterisation of mouse epididymosomes reveals a complex profi... 2016 · 247 cites

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mouse bulk-RNA-seq with striking metric divergence: excellent base quality (Q30=95.8%, mean=36.6%) contrasts with extreme duplication (82.37%, scored 0/100). Duplication indicates heavy PCR bias despite good sequencing; not recommended for quantitative reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.011 measured

pct q20 bases 97.9 measured

pct q30 bases 95.8 measured

gc content pct 56.7 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 36.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 82.37 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.8 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.6 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 82.37 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0