Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE80280

GEO first seen 2017

3D structures of individual mammalian genomes reveal principles of nuclear organization

Organism
Mus musculus
Samples
42
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2016-04-14

The folding of genomic DNA from the beads-on-a-string like structure of nucleosomes into higher order assemblies is thought to be critically linked to nuclear processes, but it is unclear to what degree it is a cause or consequence of function. We have calculated the first 3D structural models of entire mammalian genomes using data from a new chromosome conformation capture protocol that allows us to first image and then process single cells. This has allowed us to study the folding of chromosom...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 11 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Ernest D Laue
Reused by

9 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.015 measured
pct q20 bases 99.2 measured
pct q30 bases 97.4 measured
gc content pct 53.5 measured
mean read length 46 measured
mean base quality 38.7 measured
adapter content pct 1.09 measured
duplication rate pct 5.73 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.4 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80