Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE81904

GEO first seen 2018

Drop-Seq analysis of P17 FACS sorted retinal cells from the Tg(Chx10-EGFP/cre,-ALPP)2Clc or Vsx2-GFP transgenic line

Organism
Mus musculus
Samples
6
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2016-05-25

Vsx2-GFP mouse retinas were dissected, FACS sorted for GFP+ cells and single-cell mRNAseq libraries generated with Drop-Seq

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 10 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Karthik Shekhar
Reused by

5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from mouse tissue. Grade D (68/100) reflects two critical failures: Q30 bases at 79.4% (scored 47/100) and mean base quality of 31.7 (scored 62/100), both substantially below acceptable thresholds. The read length of 20 bp is extremely short for RNA-seq and compounds mapping and annotation challenges; this dataset is not recommended for reuse.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Files available
BAM, R, RDATA, TXT
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.011 measured
pct q20 bases 89.1 measured
pct q30 bases 79.4 measured
gc content pct 46.7 measured
mean read length 20 measured
mean base quality 31.7 measured
adapter content pct 0.51 measured
duplication rate pct 22.78 measured
supplementary file types BAM, R, RDATA, TXT reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 79.4 measured ×1 47%
mean base quality 31.7 measured ×0.6 62%
adapter content pct 0.51 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 22.78 measured ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 97