Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE84320

GEO first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Deep data QC

26/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Low-quality bulk human RNA-seq with concerning metrics (5.1% Q30, mean base quality 24.5) despite 109bp reads; severe quality degradation necessitates aggressive filtering or serves primarily as a cautionary example of sequencing failure.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 88.2 measured
pct q30 bases 5.1 measured
gc content pct 48.5 measured
mean read length 109.5 measured
mean base quality 24.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 48.98 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 26/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 5.1 measured ×1 0%
mean base quality 24.5 measured ×0.6 0%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 48.98 measured ×0.4 58%
QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0