GSE85251

GEO first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Postnatal DNA demethylation and its role in tissue maturation 2018 · 84 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured

gc content pct 30.9 measured

mean read length 126 measured

mean base quality 35.3 measured

adapter content pct 21.96 measured

duplication rate pct 50.07 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.1 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0