Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Tumor-suppressor genes that escape from X-inactivation contribut... 2016 · 477 cites
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse bulk RNA-seq with 75 bp reads shows excellent quality (94.9% Q30, 96.6% Q20) and minimal adapter content, providing good balance between isoform resolution and base accuracy. This dataset is well-suited for reuse in expression profiling studies requiring detection of transcript variants and is suitable for studies of tissue-specific or condition-dependent splicing.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0