GSE86552

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Bicarbonate Recycling by HIF-1–Dependent Carbonic Anhydrase Isof... 2017 · 75 cites

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Rat bulk RNA-seq of high quality with one limiting factor: elevated duplication (39.83%, scored 78/100) that moderately inflates abundance for duplicated transcripts. Strong base accuracy (mean Q=36.5, Q30=95.5%) and negligible adapters make this acceptable if duplication effects are acknowledged.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Rattus norvegicus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.024 measured

pct q20 bases 97.8 measured

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured

gc content pct 50.6 measured

mean read length 49.6 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 39.83 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 36.5 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 39.83 measured ×0.4 78%

QC cost 1.9 min compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0