GSE86809

GEO first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

TEAD4 ensures postimplantation development by promoting trophobl... 2020 · 161 cites

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mouse bulk RNA-seq with 100 bp reads and good quality (89.5% Q30, 95.4% Q20) provides solid coverage for isoform-level analysis with minimal adapter content. The data quality is sufficient for reliable expression profiling and is suitable for reuse in standard RNA-seq workflows and comparative transcriptomics studies in rodent systems.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.4 measured

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured

gc content pct 51 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.28 measured

duplication rate pct 11.15 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured ×1 98%

mean base quality 35.1 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.28 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 11.15 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 34 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0