← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Chemical Proteomics Identifies Druggable Vulnerabilities in a Ge... 2017 · 287 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
29 / 29 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
62422849200
reported
total reads
744474046
reported
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
97.9
measured
pct q30 bases
96.6
measured
gc content pct
49.4
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
35
measured
adapter content pct
0.21
measured
duplication rate pct
23.12
measured
supplementary file types
BED, CSV
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
96.6
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0