Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE89632

GEO first seen 2020

Genome-wide analysis of hepatic gene expression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and in healthy donors in relation to hepatic fatty acid composition and other nutritional factors

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
63
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2016-11-07

In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), hepatic gene expression and fatty acid (FA) composition have been reported independently but a comprehensive gene expression profiling in relation to FA composition is lacking. The aim was to assess this relationship. In a cross-sectional study, hepatic gene expression (Illumina Microarray) was first compared among 20 patients with simple steatosis (SS), 19 with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and 24 healthy controls (HC). FA composition in hepat...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 71 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Johane P AllardBianca M ArendtElena M ComelliDavid W MaWendy LouAnastasia TeterinaTaeHyung KimScott K FungDavid K WongIan McGilvraySandra E Fischer
Reused by

69 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 45