Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- A bacterial global regulator forms a prion 2017 · 166 cites
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
E. coli bulk RNA-seq with moderate usability hampered by extreme duplication (69.73%, scored 12/100)—highly unusual for prokaryotic RNA-seq and indicating technical failure (over-amplification, contamination). Good base quality (Q30=94.3%) cannot compensate; differential abundance estimates invalid.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0