GSE92250

GEO first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

PAN-cancer analysis of S-phase enriched lncRNAs identifies oncog... 2018 · 120 cites

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human bulk RNA-seq unsuitable for any use; catastrophic base quality (Q30=38.8%, mean=23.4%, both scored 0/100) indicates sequencing failure or data corruption. Discard immediately.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 66.8 measured

pct q30 bases 38.8 measured

gc content pct 0 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 23.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 5.49 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 38.8 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 23.4 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 5.49 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0