GSE92840

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

The RNAi Inheritance Machinery of<i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> 2017 · 154 cites

Deep data QC

78/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

C. elegans bulk RNA-seq unsuitable for reuse due to catastrophic duplication (70.5%, scored 10/100)—likely reflecting over-amplification or biological artifacts that severely bias transcript quantification. Secondary adapter issue (9.3%) compounds the problem.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Caenorhabditis elegans

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 95.7 measured

pct q30 bases 94.2 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 34.4 measured

adapter content pct 9.3 measured

duplication rate pct 70.5 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 78/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.2 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 34.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 9.3 measured ×0.4 59%

duplication rate pct 70.5 measured ×0.4 10%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0