GSE93421

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Interpretable dimensionality reduction of single cell transcript... 2018 · 382 cites

5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Files available

HDF5

Metrics (value · how obtained)

supplementary file types HDF5 reported

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

2 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 79