GSE94043

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Identification of balanced chromosomal rearrangements previously... 2017 · 71 cites

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Human bulk RNA-seq not recommended; marginal base quality (Q30=66.1% scored 0/100, mean=29.2%) coupled with elevated N content (0.4%) suggests sequencing or alignment errors. Validation and aggressive preprocessing required before use.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.403 measured

pct q20 bases 80.3 measured

pct q30 bases 66.1 measured

gc content pct 46.3 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 29.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 10.16 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 66.1 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 29.2 measured ×0.6 20%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 10.16 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0