GSE94402

GEO first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Exposure to the gut microbiota drives distinct methylome and tra... 2018 · 153 cites

Deep data QC

88/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mouse bulk RNA-seq with generally solid quality but problematic adapter contamination (15.02%, scored 28/100). While base metrics are strong (Q30=91.3%), this adapter level requires aggressive trimming or dataset rejection before alignment. Conditional reuse only.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.026 measured

pct q20 bases 94.5 measured

pct q30 bases 91.3 measured

gc content pct 47.6 measured

mean read length 126 measured

mean base quality 34.7 measured

adapter content pct 15.02 measured

duplication rate pct 24.9 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 88/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.3 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 34.7 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 15.02 measured ×0.4 28%

duplication rate pct 24.9 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0