GSE94906

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

The expression profiles of miRNA–mRNA of early response in genet... 2017 · 84 cites

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Tilapia bulk RNA-seq with extreme duplication (86.86%, scored 0/100), unusual even for high-copy regions and suggesting PCR artifacts or polyploidy-driven complexity. Despite excellent base quality (Q30=97.9%), use cautiously and avoid copy-number or isoform inference without validation.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Oreochromis niloticus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 98.9 measured

pct q30 bases 97.9 measured

gc content pct 52.2 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 38.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 86.86 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 86.86 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0