GSE94922

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Metazoan Nuclear Pores Provide a Scaffold for Poised Genes and M... 2017 · 141 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ChIP-seq

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 1.541 measured

pct q20 bases 86.7 measured

pct q30 bases 82.9 measured

gc content pct 51.5 measured

mean read length 42 measured

mean base quality 33.3 measured

adapter content pct 6.72 measured

duplication rate pct 10.41 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.9 measured ×1 65%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0