← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Epigenome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in lung tissue shows... 2017 · 118 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.077
measured
pct q20 bases
97.1
measured
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
gc content pct
23
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
36.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
1.03
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0