GSE96682

GEO first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Analysis of chromatin accessibility uncovers TEAD1 as a regulato... 2018 · 100 cites

Deep data QC

55/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Severely compromised human bulk-RNA-seq with disqualifying adapter contamination (30.77%, scored 0/100). Exacerbated by marginal Q30 bases (78.3%, scored 42/100). High read length (125 bp) suggests attempted long-read protocol with failed adapter removal. Not suitable for reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 87.6 measured

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured

gc content pct 47.6 measured

mean read length 125 measured

mean base quality 33.1 measured

adapter content pct 30.77 measured

duplication rate pct 8.22 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 55/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.3 measured ×1 42%

mean base quality 33.1 measured ×0.6 85%

adapter content pct 30.77 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 8.22 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0