GSE97058

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Argonaute CLIP Defines a Deregulated miR-122-Bound Transcriptome... 2017 · 83 cites

Deep data QC

85/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mouse bulk RNA-seq suitable with reservations; elevated duplication (47.15%, scored 62/100) and modest Q30 (86.4%, scored 82/100) together suggest over-amplification or suboptimal prep, inflating abundance for duplicated loci. Use cautiously for quantitative studies.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.213 measured

pct q20 bases 93.2 measured

pct q30 bases 86.4 measured

gc content pct 54.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 33.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 47.15 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 85/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 86.4 measured ×1 82%

mean base quality 33.8 measured ×0.6 97%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 47.15 measured ×0.4 62%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0