← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Temporal transcriptional logic of dynamic regulatory networks un... 2018 · 215 cites
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Arabidopsis thaliana
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
99
measured
pct q30 bases
95.2
measured
gc content pct
46.3
measured
mean read length
84.3
measured
mean base quality
36.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
21.52
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36.9
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
21.52
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0