GSE97901

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

A Panel of MicroRNAs as Diagnostic Biomarkers for the Identifica... 2017 · 80 cites

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk-RNA-seq human dataset with measured base quality. Grade-limiting factor is extreme duplication (90.92%), which scored 0/100 despite high Q30 bases (97.3%) and mean quality (38.3)—this level of duplication indicates severe PCR bias, problematic for quantitative expression studies. Not recommended for reuse without duplication-aware analysis or UMI deduplication.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 97.9 measured

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured

gc content pct 54.2 measured

mean read length 29.3 measured

mean base quality 38.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 90.92 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 90.92 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0