Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Single-cell profiling reveals heterogeneity and functional patte... 2017 · 100 cites
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse bulk-RNA-seq from NextSeq 500 with moderate base quality but extremely high duplication (64.56%). The duplication rate—scored only 23/100—indicates severe PCR amplification bias that will distort expression quantification. Not recommended for reuse without specialized deduplication or digital PCR.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0