← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
41/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 / 6 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
48731163057
reported
total reads
323134269
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
82
measured
pct q30 bases
69
measured
gc content pct
48.7
measured
mean read length
75.5
measured
mean base quality
29.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
7.52
measured
supplementary file types
CSV, TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 41/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
69
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
29.9
measured
×0.6
32%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
7.52
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0