← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Camellia sinensis
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 / 2 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
167480481
reported
total reads
7529265
reported
n content pct
0.019
measured
pct q20 bases
98.9
measured
pct q30 bases
95.7
measured
gc content pct
46.3
measured
mean read length
22.4
measured
mean base quality
37.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
39.01
measured
supplementary file types
XLS
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.8
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
39.01
measured
×0.4
80%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0