GSE98562

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

A comparison of Illumina and Ion Torrent sequencing platforms in... 2017 · 97 cites

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Severely compromised mouse RNA-seq with failing quality metrics. Q30 bases at only 3.3% and mean quality of 23.4 (both scored 0/100) indicate major sequencing failure, likely due to reagent/protocol issues. Not suitable for reuse; requires resequencing.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 82.4 measured

pct q30 bases 3.3 measured

gc content pct 49.7 measured

mean read length 126.9 measured

mean base quality 23.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 32.1 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 3.3 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 23.4 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 32.1 measured ×0.4 95%

QC cost 37 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0