Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- DNA methylation clocks tick in naked mole rats but queens age mo... 2021 · 110 cites
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Heterocephalus glaber (naked mole-rat) bulk RNA-seq with measured quality metrics showing 98.7% Q20 and 96% Q30 bases on 51 bp reads, despite unavailable fetch data preventing full experimental details. The consistent base quality and low N-content (0.004%) suggest high-fidelity short-read RNA sequencing suitable for studying eusocial mammal transcriptomics. Consider that the missing metadata limits verification of library preparation method and potential batch effects in downstream analyses.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0