Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) bulk RNA-seq with 49 bp short reads at 98.6% Q20 and 93.8% Q30 quality, though experimental protocol details are unavailable. The low adapter content (0%) and measured 45.7% GC content indicate clean sequencing run suitable for examining cultivated cotton gene expression. Users should note the missing instrument information and consider whether this dataset's quality is sufficient for variant calling or requires dedicated genomic DNA sequencing for more comprehensive agricultural genomics.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0