← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
AB SOLiD 4 System
Platform
ABI_SOLID
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,207 / 878 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
14269581889945
reported
total reads
153274240233
reported
n content pct
0.961
measured
pct q20 bases
78.7
measured
pct q30 bases
51.9
measured
gc content pct
53.9
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
25
measured
adapter content pct
0.09
measured
duplication rate pct
15.91
measured
supplementary file types
BAM, BED, WIG
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
51.9
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0