Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Multi-organism bulk RNA-seq using Illumina HiSeq 2000 across diverse vertebrates (Xenopus tropicalis, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, Tetraodon nigroviridis, Anolis carolinensis) with exceptionally high base quality (100% Q20/Q30). The ~1.37 billion short reads and 202 billion bases enable comparative transcriptomics across phylogenetically distant species. This dataset is well-suited for studying conserved versus lineage-specific gene expression patterns, though users should verify organism-specific biological variation isn't confounded with technical batch effects.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0