Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila melanogaster bulk RNA-seq with notably lower quality metrics (58.3% Q20, 39.3% Q30) and shorter 39 bp reads compared to typical standards, plus elevated N-content (0.044%). While the mean base quality of 20.6 is borderline for expression analysis, this dataset may still support abundance estimation if downstream mapping tolerates lower base accuracy. Consider quality-filtered trimming before assembly or variant work, and verify whether the sequencing run or sample preparation contributed to degraded quality.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0