Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Sinorhizobium meliloti bulk RNA-seq (nitrogen-fixing rhizobium) with 86.2% Q20 and 79.2% Q30 quality on 50 bp reads, hampered by elevated adapter content (5.96%) and lower mean base quality (29.2). The 60% GC content reflects this bacterium's high-GC genome. While usable for abundance estimation, prioritize rigorous adapter trimming and consider this dataset for exploratory work rather than high-stringency variant calling in bacterial symbiosis studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0