Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq with excellent base quality (98.3% Q20, 95.1% Q30) and 51 bp read length, though metadata retrieval failed. The 0.85% adapter content is moderate and should be trimmed pre-processing. This human transcriptome dataset's high quality supports robust differential expression studies and splicing analysis across cell types or conditions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0