Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq with 100 bp reads (longer than standard short-read) showing 97% Q20 but notably elevated adapter content at 22.18%, suggesting potential ligation or library amplification issues. The mean base quality of 35.5 and 56.1% GC are acceptable. Users should aggressively trim adapters and assess whether the longer read length compensates for contamination in downstream applications like isoform quantification or fusion detection.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0