Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus bulk RNA-seq delivering 98.6% Q20 and 97% Q30 with 50 bp reads and minimal adapter contamination (0.06%). The near-perfect base composition (50.9% GC) and high mean quality (38.2) indicate well-executed sequencing. This dataset is well-suited for sensitive detection of lowly expressed genes and splice junction mapping in mouse development or disease models.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0