Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Danio rerio (zebrafish) bulk RNA-seq with 100 bp reads at 98.8% Q20 and 93.9% Q30, minimal adapter content (0.03%), and balanced 46.3% GC. The combination of length and quality enables comprehensive splicing analysis and accurate transcript isoform assignment in this model organism for developmental and chemical genomics studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0