GSM1420232

GEO first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

53/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Mus musculus RNA-Seq with concerning 84.8% Q20, 76.4% Q30 at 100 bp reads, and 0.71% adapter—lower quality profile. Requires quality filtering for sensitive applications.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.036 measured

pct q20 bases 84.8 measured

pct q30 bases 76.4 measured

gc content pct 51.4 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 30.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.71 measured

duplication rate pct 44.95 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 53/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 76.4 measured ×1 32%

mean base quality 30.8 measured ×0.6 47%

adapter content pct 0.71 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 44.95 measured ×0.4 67%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0