GSM1679873

GEO first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured

gc content pct 32.3 measured

mean read length 29 measured

mean base quality 36.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 86.03 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.4 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0