Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSM2186728

GEO sample

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

67/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Saccharomyces cerevisiae bulk-RNA-seq with 50 bp reads achieved exceptional basecall quality (99.1% Q20, 97.3% Q30), but displays critically high 96.68% adapter contamination indicating likely library contamination with adapter-only fragments. Rigorous demultiplexing and adapter removal is essential; users should verify insert-size distributions before proceeding with expression analysis in this yeast model.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 99.1 measured
pct q30 bases 97.3 measured
gc content pct 45.2 measured
mean read length 50 measured
mean base quality 38.4 measured
adapter content pct 96.68 measured
duplication rate pct 76.03 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 67/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.3 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 38.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 96.68 measured ×0.4 0%
duplication rate pct 76.03 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 76