GSM2667753

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from Homo sapiens; A-grade (95/100). Identical to SRX2916201 cohort (42.65% duplication, Q39.9 mean); same duplication and batch-correction considerations apply for reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.026 measured

pct q20 bases 99.2 measured

pct q30 bases 97.6 measured

gc content pct 54.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 39.9 measured

adapter content pct 2.27 measured

duplication rate pct 42.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 39.9 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 2.27 measured ×0.4 99%

duplication rate pct 42.65 measured ×0.4 72%

QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 90

pysradb: A Python package to query next-generation sequencin... L1 90/100