Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Rattus norvegicus bulk-RNA-seq features 75bp reads with 92.2% Q20 and 89.6% Q30 quality scores, undocumented sequencing platform, and moderate GC bias (49.6%). While the metrics suggest usable data for rat gene expression studies, researchers should verify experimental design and biological context from the parent study before integration.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0