← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Drosophila melanogaster
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer II
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
207 / 121 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
197715895180
reported
total reads
2589989406
reported
n content pct
0.077
measured
pct q20 bases
61.6
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
gc content pct
51.2
measured
mean read length
45
measured
mean base quality
19.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.91
measured
duplication rate pct
14.74
measured
supplementary file types
BEDGRAPH, GFF, SAM
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
19.6
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.91
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
14.74
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
8 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0